Designer on why Samantha's gown became a 'revenge dress'

Samantha Ruth Prabhu’s translation of her wedding gown into a bold achromatic 'revenge dress' successful 2024 made headlines not conscionable for its manner statement, but for the almighty connection down it. After her precise nationalist divided from Naga Chaitanya, Samantha chose not to fell her symptom but to reclaim her narrative.

Now, some Samantha and decorator Kresha Bajaj person opened up astir the affectional value of the gown’s melodramatic makeover—revealing a communicative of healing, strength, and starting anew.Samantha joined Naga Chaitanya successful 2017, wearing a floral-detailed wedding gown that held heavy sentimental value. But pursuing their divorce, she gave the gown a bold makeover. In 2024, she re-wore it arsenic a striking achromatic 'revenge dress.'

Designer Kresha Bajaj has present revealed the crushed down the melodramatic transformation.In an interrogation with Pinkvilla, decorator Kresha opened up astir transforming Samantha's wedding gown into a 'revenge dress.' She explained that the formal was much than conscionable a garment—it was an affectional representation turned into thing new. Samantha wanted to reclaim thing profoundly personal, and Kresha felt honoured to assistance with the process.

The extremity wasn’t to erase the past but to admit it gracefully and reimagine it into thing almighty and unique, portion keeping the archetypal essence intact.In different interrogation with Galatta India, the histrion had opened up astir wherefore she chose to change her wedding gown—a awesome of her past. She revealed that aft a divorce, women often look harsh judgement and stigma, being labeled arsenic “used” oregon “second-hand.” Samantha shared that nine expects divorced women to consciousness ashamed oregon similar failures.

By transforming her wedding dress, she reclaimed power implicit that narrative—not conscionable for herself, but to talk for countless women and families who endure akin symptom and pressure.Samantha went connected to clarify that the translation of her wedding formal wasn’t an enactment of revenge, arsenic galore assumed. She admitted it whitethorn person appeared that way, but the existent intent was acold much personal. Her fairytale didn’t person the ending she erstwhile imagined, but she didn’t privation to beryllium backmost and mourn it. Instead, she wanted to look her symptom head-on and clasp a caller beginning. By wearing the altered gown, Samantha symbolised strength, acceptance, and moving forward—proving that wherever thing ends, thing caller and empowering tin begin.