4 hours ago
1
The thought of the Global South historically referred to the grouping of countries chiefly successful Asia, Africa and Latin America that shared a past of colonialism and ongoing struggles against planetary inequalities. They sought to alteration a historically Western-dominated satellite bid done ‘South-South cooperation’ — a acceptable of practices and organising concepts that these nations purpose to usage to execute improvement done communal assistance and accrued solidarity among themselves.
This aspiration has roots successful landmark initiatives specified arsenic the Bandung Conference of 1955 and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which sought to foster economical and taste practice portion promoting quality rights and establishing a New International Economic Order (NIEO). These movements aimed to counteract the vertical powerfulness relations betwixt erstwhile colonies and their colonisers, advocating for just commercialized relationships, sovereignty implicit earthy resources, and the close to nationalise cardinal industries.
Also Read | Global South’s dependable cardinal to modern world’s progress: PM Modi tells Ghana’s Parliament
The Global South has ne'er been monolithic. Its diverseness — vastly antithetic histories, economies and governmental systems — has been some a imaginable root of spot and a origin of interior divisions that complicate efforts to signifier unified positions connected planetary issues.
However, the BRICS grouping has emerged arsenic a much solidified possibility, representing a formalised effort to beforehand galore of the Global South’s aims, adjacent if it doesn’t wholly embody its afloat aspirations oregon flooded each its inherent contradictions.
The caller BRICS acme held successful Rio de Janeiro exemplified this challenge, with members navigating antithetic relationships with some the U.S. and Russia, peculiarly regarding the ongoing struggle successful Ukraine, wherever astir BRICS members person sought a mediate crushed successful opposition to Western positions.
Institutional voice
BRICS began arsenic an economical acronym coined by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill successful 2001. It has present evolved into a important intergovernmental organisation comprising 35% of the planetary system and astir fractional of the world’s colonisation — surpassing the G7’s 30% economical stock arsenic of 2024.
The bloc’s superior objectives centre connected fostering economic, political, and societal practice among members portion expanding their corporate power successful planetary governance. This includes advocating for greater practice successful planetary bodies, coordinating economical policy, and reducing reliance connected the U.S. dollar. Initiatives specified arsenic the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA) were designed to connection alternatives to Western-dominated fiscal institutions specified arsenic the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.
Also Read | G7 summit: Will item priorities of Global South successful G-7, says PM Modi
The Rio acme demonstrated some the imaginable and limitations of this approach. The declaration’s beardown connection connected Gaza and Iran reflected genuine statement connected captious geopolitical issues arsenic opposed to the West’s view, portion India’s palmy inclusion of condemnation of the Pahalgam panic onslaught showcased the bloc’s capableness to code divers information concerns. The acme besides endorsed expanded roles for India and Brazil successful the UN Security Council, advancing a long-standing request for greater Global South representation.
Significantly, the acme introduced a caller “partner countries” category, extending subordinate presumption to nations including Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan. This organization innovation suggests BRICS is evolving beyond its archetypal rank operation to accommodate broader Global South participation.
Priorities and realities
The Global South’s diverseness becomes peculiarly evident erstwhile examining BRICS members’ antithetic determination contexts and priorities. Brazil’s absorption connected biology issues and sustainable improvement reflects its relation arsenic a guardian of the Amazon rainforest, portion besides serving its agribusiness interests. India’s accent connected exertion and services reflects its emergence arsenic a planetary IT powerhouse, adjacent arsenic it maintains important cultivation and manufacturing sectors.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative represents possibly the astir ambitious effort astatine South-South cooperation, yet it has besides generated concerns astir indebtedness dependency among recipient countries. Russia’s inclusion successful BRICS, contempt its geographical determination mostly successful the Global North, reflects however the grouping wants to transcend elemental geographical boundaries for shared interests successful challenging Western hegemony.
Intra-BRICS commercialized has grown astatine a faster gait than that of G7 countries, demonstrating tangible shifts successful planetary economical activity. Trade betwixt Brazil and China accrued fiftyfold successful 20 years, and China-India commercialized roseate 28 times successful the aforesaid period. The NDB has begun providing alternate backing for sustainable improvement and infrastructure projects, addressing perceived gaps near by accepted fiscal institutions.
Yet, the way to challenging Western economical dominance faces important obstacles. The U.S. dollar remains entrenched arsenic the world’s main reserve currency, utilized successful the immense bulk of planetary commercialized transactions. While BRICS advocates for lesser dependence connected the dollar, creating a workable alternate currency strategy faces tremendous method and governmental hurdles.
Internal Contradictions
A captious introspection of BRICS reveals inherent contradictions that reflector broader challenges successful South-South cooperation. While the rhetoric emphasises solidarity and communal benefit, the pursuit of nationalist interests by idiosyncratic members tin overshadow corporate goals.
For example, China’s domination wrong the grouping has resulted successful lopsided economical engagement with different processing nations, starring to what immoderate critics person termed “near-colonial patterns of trade”, wherever earthy materials are exported to China successful speech for manufacturing goods. Brazil’s advocacy for fairer planetary trading systems, portion simultaneously pursuing the interests of its competitory export-oriented agribusiness sector, exemplifies however nationalist economical interests tin complicate corporate solidarity. Russia’s caller actions successful Ukraine negate the thought of South-South practice arsenic a bequest of erstwhile colonised nations.
Besides, Western powers person not remained passive observers of BRICS’ growth. Donald Trump, responding to the bloc’s disapproval of unilateral tariffs and subject strikes connected Iran, threatened that immoderate state “aligning itself with” what helium termed “the Anti-American policies of BRICS” would look an further 10% tariff. This marked an escalation from his earlier threats of 100% tariffs if BRICS countries attempted to regenerate the U.S. dollar arsenic a reserve currency.
Moreover, Western institutions person shown capableness to accommodate and co-opt rising powers. The emergence of the G20 tin beryllium seen arsenic a effect designed to springiness emerging economies a spot astatine the table, adjacent if decision-making remains mostly influenced by ascendant Western powers.
Beyond National Interests: A People-Centered Vision
As India prepares to presume BRICS enactment adjacent twelvemonth with its taxable of ‘Building Resilience and Innovation for Cooperation and Sustainability’, the bloc stands astatine a crossroads. As the world’s largest ideology and a large system with analyzable relationships with some China and the U.S., India whitethorn beryllium uniquely positioned to span interior divisions wrong BRICS. However, ongoing borderline tensions with China and India’s increasing strategical concern with the U.S. done initiatives specified arsenic the Quad complicate its relation arsenic a unifying force.
BRICS undoubtedly represents the astir viable organization look of Global South aspirations, offering processing nations unprecedented corporate economical leverage and governmental dependable successful planetary affairs. However, its existent trajectory risks becoming simply different arena for large powerfulness contention alternatively than genuine transformation. The bloc’s eventual committedness lies not successful replacing Western hegemony with a caller signifier of elite-driven multipolarity, but successful evolving into a level that prioritises the developmental needs and antiauthoritarian aspirations of the Global South’s peoples.
English (US) ·