In a large embarrassment for Punjab Police, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has declared the apprehension of euphony shaper Pushpinder Pal Singh Dhaliwal, besides known arsenic Pinky Dhaliwal, illegal, portion citing superior violations of law and procedural safeguards.
Advertisement
Justice Harpreet Singh Brar held that Dhaliwal’s detention by Mataur constabulary successful Mohali was successful "direct contravention of Article 21" of the Constitution and an "incurable illegality" that vitiated the full proceedings against him.
The tribunal recovered that Dhaliwal was subjected to custodial interrogation adjacent earlier an FIR was registered against him. Referring to authoritative records, the tribunal noted that helium was picked up from his residence astatine 7:30 p.m. connected March 8 nether the pretext of questioning. A regular diary study introduction was recorded astatine 7:48 p.m. upon his accomplishment astatine Mataur constabulary station, but the FIR was not lodged against him astatine that stage.
Justice Brar noted that officials failed to supply a transcript of the FIR oregon the apprehension memo erstwhile the Warrant Officer arrived astatine the constabulary station. It was lone astatine 2:26 p.m. connected March 9 that the Station House Officer handed implicit a transcript of the FIR on with a DDR, the memo of idiosyncratic search, and the memo of arrest. The Warrant Officer’s study further indicated that some the idiosyncratic hunt and apprehension memos were signed —along with the witnesses and the detainee — lone astatine 2:30 AM.
Holding that the detention was "illegal successful the eyes of law," Justice Brar referred to "total non-compliance" with Section 47 of BNSS and a usurpation of Article 22 of the Constitution. The Bench observed that Dhaliwal was informed of the grounds of his apprehension lone aft a lapse of 7 hours, that excessively successful the beingness of the Warrant Officer. Such procedural lapses, the tribunal asserted, were successful "clear contravention of the principles laid down successful Supreme Court’s judgement successful Vihaan Kumar’s case."
The Bench besides took enactment of the information that the constabulary lone registered the FIR and issued the apprehension memo aft the Warrant Officer’s arrival, terming it a "deliberate attempt" to obscure procedural irregularities and warrant their amerciable actions.
“The consequent registration of the FIR and the issuance of the apprehension memo lone aft the accomplishment of the Warrant Officer look to beryllium a deliberate effort by constabulary officials to obscure procedural irregularities and warrant their amerciable actions,” Justice Brar asserted.
The tribunal observed that the constabulary failed to comply with Section 35(3) of BNSS, which mandates the issuance of a announcement earlier arrest. Instead, the constabulary proceeded straight to apprehension Dhaliwal, violating Section 35(1)(c), which lays down duplicate conditions for making an apprehension successful cases punishable with imprisonment exceeding 7 years—there indispensable beryllium credible accusation that the accused has committed a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment of much than 7 years; and the constabulary serviceman indispensable person crushed to believe, based connected specified credible information, that the accused has committed the offence.
"No reasons were recorded by the constabulary to found that the accusation received was credible oregon that the apprehension of the detainee was necessary," Justice Brar asserted, portion allowing the habeas corpus petition. The tribunal ordered Dhaliwal’s "immediate release" unless required successful transportation with different case. earlier parting with the case, Justice Brar asserted: "Consequently, the apprehension of the detainee successful transportation with FIR stands vitiated and is declared illegal."
English (US) ·