Home / Punjab / High Court to perceive tree-felling lawsuit connected Friday
Chief Justice Nagu had taken enactment of the study ‘DLF task sparks outcry successful Aravallis, activists protestation extracurricular minister’s home’
Photo for representational intent only. iStock
Just astir a fortnight aft the Punjab and Haryana High Court took suo motu announcement of the Tribune study alleging felling of 2,000 trees crossed 40 acres reportedly to marque mode for a existent property project, a retired professor-cum-advocate contiguous told a Division Bench that “the full wood would beryllium wiped off” if axing was allowed to continue.
Appearing earlier the Bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry, Amita Singh contended that the felling was taking spot astatine nighttime and they could perceive the peacocks cry. Taking a enactment of arguments and counterarguments successful the matter, the Bench fixed the lawsuit for further proceeding connected Friday connected the contented of “interim relief”.
At the precise onset, State counsel Ankur Mittal submitted that the onshore was not forest. It was not adjacent a portion of the Aravalli plantation, but was privately owned. “The section of wood is the main due party, which has accorded the permissions for the felling of the trees…. If the tribunal permits a week's time, I volition beryllium successful a presumption to spot connected grounds the presumption report, bringing connected grounds the geographical concern also, due to the fact that the content taken is that the onshore is simply a portion of Aravallis. It is not. It is simply a privately owned land, permissions person been granted with conditions imposed,” helium submitted.
The Bench was besides told that the paper study said “it was the Aravallis which person been deforested. But the information of the substance is that this is licensed since mode backmost successful 1996”.
The Bench, however, asserted, “Submit connected an affidavit immoderate you want”. Amita Singh, meanwhile, pressed for an contiguous stay. She said the wood would beryllium wiped out. “This would pb america obscurity due to the fact that the full intent of this effort would to beryllium defeated… Immediate enactment should beryllium granted, different determination is nary request for america to marque each the effort. And you sitting 250 kilometers distant person successful specified an enlightened mode taken cognisance of this,” she added. Counsel Deepak Balyan is representing the municipal corporation, portion elder advocates Randep Singh Rai and Chetan Mittal are appearing for the DLF
Chief Justice Nagu had taken enactment of the quality point “DLF task sparks outcry successful Aravallis, activists protestation extracurricular minister’s home”. The quality study had referred to the claims of the residents and biology activists that the builder was “destroying the Aravallis” and had launched protests and authoritative petitions seeking an contiguous halt to the activity. Chief Justice Nagu, successful his note, had referred to the biology concerns highlighted successful the quality item, including issues related to ecological equilibrium and pollution.