Sunil Gavaskar and Jasprit Bumrah (Getty Images)
Jasprit Bumrah’s lack from India’s playing XI successful the 2nd Test against England astatine Edgbaston sparked wide debate, particularly aft his standout show successful the bid opener astatine Leeds.
The prima pacer, who had dismantled England’s batting line-up with precision and pace, was rested for workload absorption — a determination that near fans and cricket pundits puzzled. Among those questioning the determination was legendary batter Sunil Gavaskar. Speaking connected Sony Sports Network, Gavaskar drew attraction to however erstwhile generations managed their fittingness and lucifer readiness, adjacent without modern-day enactment systems. He invoked the legendary Kapil Dev arsenic a premier illustration of relentless mentation and durability.Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! “How did they play? I deliberation their grooming was a small spot different,” Gavaskar remarked. “Kapil (Dev) was hardly ever successful the gym. He was moving around, moving astir and past helium was bowling to astir 5 oregon six batters successful the nets. Then helium would travel successful again and bat himself and vessel to a mates more.”
Poll
Should players similar Jasprit Bumrah beryllium rested during important series?
Yes, to negociate workloadNo, they should play
Gavaskar emphasised that Kapil’s regular wasn’t built astir fittingness fads, but astir doing the occupation repeatedly until his assemblage adapted.
“So fundamentally helium was doing what his assemblage required. What his expertise required which is bowl, vessel and bowl. So his bowling muscles and the full assemblage was utilized to bowling. He was a superb athlete. I deliberation helium could person been a champion successful immoderate sport. He did what his assemblage required. It was to play cricket, practise cricket,” helium further added.
IND vs ENG 2nd Test: Rain Arrives After Stumps connected Day 3 | What It Means for India’s Batting
While Bumrah had stated up of the bid that helium would play lone 3 of the 5 Tests, Gavaskar’s comments shed airy connected a broader statement successful modern cricket: are today’s stars being overprotected? India’s onslaught astatine Edgbaston lacked the aforesaid wound without Bumrah, and critics reason that resting a match-winner successful a high-stakes bid whitethorn beryllium a misstep. Gavaskar’s reflections don’t straight criticise Bumrah but item a displacement successful mindset — 1 wherever workload absorption often replaces the rugged endurance of the past.