The real outcome of the BRICS Summit in New Delhi was not just the Joint Declaration. It was the diplomatic space that India managed to create for itself at a time when the world is increasingly divided.Getting all members to agree on a common document was no small achievement. The differences were particularly sharp over West Asia, with Iran and the UAE sitting on opposite sides of a rapidly changing regional conflict. Yet, on the sidelines of the summit, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian met Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The two discussed efforts to ease tensions and promote regional stability.For India, the meeting was a striking example of what its BRICS presidency offered: a platform where countries with difficult relationships could still talk. It also helped create the conditions for a consensus declaration calling for maximum restraint and dialogue in West Asia.Modi used the summit to push his larger message that the Global South should become a “rule-shaper” rather than remain a “rule-follower”. The New Delhi Declaration backed the call for reforming the UN Security Council and international financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank.The declaration also gave India an important diplomatic gain on terrorism. It specifically condemned the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir that killed 26 persons, and called for zero tolerance towards terrorism, including its financing, cross-border movement and safe havens.On the economic front, BRICS opposed unilateral tariffs and other trade measures inconsistent with the WTO rules. It also backed greater use of local currencies for trade and investment and work towards interoperable payment systems. The grouping did not move towards a common currency, but the push for alternative payment mechanisms gives members more room at a time of growing trade tensions and sanctions.India also brought a practical initiative to the table — a Seafarers Emergency Support Network to help seafarers affected by conflicts and disruptions to maritime routes.The West Asia section of the declaration, meanwhile, showed the complexity of India’s balancing act. The document expressed grave concern over the deteriorating situation, condemned attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure and called for restraint, dialogue and diplomacy. Its position on Gaza is particularly noteworthy for India, given its close and growing strategic relationship with Israel.At the same time, Modi held separate talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Pezeshkian. The discussions ranged from India-China ties and trade to the Ukraine war, West Asia, energy and maritime security. Putin also invited Modi to Russia for the next annual summit.That is perhaps where India gained most from BRICS. The grouping is too diverse to become a tightly knit geopolitical bloc. Its members have competing interests and, in some cases, deep differences. But that diversity also gives India room to engage with countries that do not always see eye to eye.Now, the challenge now is implementation. The New Delhi summit produced initiatives on trade, payments, technology, health, critical minerals and institutional reform. Their success will determine whether the summit leaves behind more than another declaration.For India, however, the larger gain is already visible. BRICS gave New Delhi a platform to speak for the Global South, advance its own interests and engage competing powers, without being forced into any one camp.


